Training managers, instructional designers, and HR directors are all hearing the same message: “AI is going to revolutionize training.”
In reality, what the market often offers are mainly tools to produce the same thing faster: generate a quiz in one click, summarize a PDF, produce an automatic voice-over, or translate a module into three languages. In other words, AI and the transformation of training are still too often limited to a productivity gain, without fundamentally rethinking the training systems.
This responds to a real productivity pressure, but it does not solve the questions you are actually asking yourself:
- How can we reduce operational errors?
- How can we speed up onboarding for a new position?
- How can we develop safer, more customer-oriented, more compliant behaviors?
- How can we prove, with hard data, that training contributes to performance?
As long as AI is content to add a layer of optimization to linear, highly theoretical learning paths, you gain production time… but you do not change learner engagement or transfer to the field.
For AI to become a strategic lever, it must be used to deeply restructure training: changing the way learning paths are designed, the way learners learn, and how impact is measured. And this is where scenario-building tools like VTS Editor make it possible to move from promise to reality. To discover concretely what you can do with VTS Editor and VTS Perform, you can visit the page Revolutionize your E-Learning strategy with Serious Factory.
Rethinking the role of training in the age of AI
From top-down transmission to AI-guided experiential learning
In many companies, the dominant model is still the “digitized course”: you start from expert content (procedure, regulation, method), break it down into screens, add a few multiple-choice questions, and consider the job done. The learner consumes, understands more or less… but never really has the opportunity to confront the real situation.
Yet what matters to you is not that your teams can recite the procedure, but that they make the right decision at the right time when faced with an angry customer, a safety incident, or a compliance alert.
AI becomes relevant when it feeds simulations rather than a simple “enhanced course.” With an authoring tool like VTS Editor, you can already:
- build scenes where the learner talks with 3D characters (Talk block),
- have them choose their answers (Sentence Choice block), click on the right elements (Clickable Areas, Decoration Interaction),
- trigger different consequences depending on their decisions (Conditions, Flags, Score).
AI amplifies this capability. It can, for example:
- generate several variations of an annual review dialogue, with more or less clumsy or assertive wording;
- suggest credible answers in an exchange with a dissatisfied customer;
- suggest additional objections in a sales scenario.
The designer keeps control: they select, rephrase, contextualize. But they no longer have to write each line of dialogue by hand. You save time while shifting from a “I learn concepts” model to an “I practice managing situations” model. This shift is at the heart of the link between AI and the transformation of training.
To go further on the benefits of interactive scenarios in your programs, you can visit the page Interactive Role Play.
From a content catalog to a data-driven skills system
If you manage a skills development plan, you know it: a catalog of modules is no longer enough. Business units expect answers to these questions:
- “Who is truly operational on this new process?”
- “Where are our risks in terms of safety or compliance?”
- “Which salespeople need targeted support on handling objections?”
AI only becomes useful if it fits into a competency-based logic and not just “training hours.” Research on adaptive learning systems has shown that fine-grained analysis of learning data can significantly improve mastery of key skills (He et al., Computers & Education, 2020).
Concretely, this implies:
- Starting from a competency framework (technical and behavioral) by role.
- Associating realistic assessment situations with these competencies: a sales serious game, a conflict management simulation, a safety scene.
- Instrumenting these scenarios so they send back detailed indicators: scores by competency, choices made, response times, recurring errors.
In VTS Editor, the Score and Check Score blocks, as well as the granularity of interactions, already make it possible to capture this level of detail via SCORM or VTS Perform.
AI adds an additional layer: it can analyze this data at scale, spot patterns (for example, a certain type of error that is closely related to field incidents), and recommend personalized remedial paths. You are no longer just “pushing” modules; you are managing a portfolio of skills in near real time.
Redefining the trainer’s role as “experience designer”
Many trainers and instructional designers experience AI with a latent worry: “If a tool can write a module, what will my role be?”
The reality is that the tasks AI automates best are precisely those that require little pedagogical value: rewriting a definition, generating factual multiple-choice questions, translating a text.
Where you become irreplaceable is in:
- choosing the critical situations to work on;
- deciding how to put learners under constructive tension (dilemmas, complex scenarios);
- defining feedback that makes people think rather than simply saying “good” or “bad”;
- orchestrating between simulation, peer exchanges, coaching, and real-world application.
A no-code tool like VTS Editor strengthens this role. You don’t need developers to:
- assemble Talk, Sentence Choice, Quiz, Drag & Drop, Score, Conditions, and Flags blocks into genuine experiences;
- integrate videos, sounds, and media into the scenery;
- build adaptive learning paths.
AI then becomes your design assistant: it suggests variations, additional cases, and wording. You remain the “instructional director” who decides on the staging, pacing, and points of focus. This change in posture is a key element of AI and the transformation of training.
To equip your teams with these new methods, you can rely on the Training & support programs built around VTS Editor and gamification.
How AI concretely restructures training systems
Building adaptive learning paths instead of standard modules
A standard module assumes that all learners need the same content at the same level of detail. You know that’s not true: some already master the basics, others need to revisit the fundamentals, still others are ready for complex cases.
The technical blocks in VTS Editor already allow you to create adaptive paths:
- Conditions and Flags to open or close branches based on choices or results,
- Check Score to direct learners to remediation or consolidation paths,
- Random and Switch to vary the cases encountered,
- Counter or Wait to manage the number of attempts and pacing.
AI enriches these branches. Imagine:
- an employee fails three times on a complaint-handling case;
- a Check Score block detects the difficulty;
- an AI Request generates, based on recurring errors and context, a personalized feedback (“You tend to offer a commercial gesture too early, before having reformulated and acknowledged the customer’s emotion…”), or even a “model” example of a response.
You get a system that does more than just say “Score 5/10, try again”; it truly supports the learner according to their profile and errors. Two people taking the “same” module will, in practice, experience two different journeys.
Research on recommendation systems in training shows that this type of personalization increases learner engagement and performance (Drachsler & Greller, LAK Conference, 2019).
Generalizing simulations and serious games rather than theoretical courses
Most training managers have, at least once, dreamed of a serious game for a critical topic: customer relations, safety, ethics, management. And often, the project was abandoned or limited to a POC due to lack of budget and time.
The challenge with AI is not to revert to old habits of producing prettier slides: it is, on the contrary, to make the generalization of simulations possible. This is where we clearly see how AI and the transformation of training can go hand in hand.
With VTS Editor, you can design a scenario skeleton:
- introduction of the situation,
- key interactions (dialogue, choices, actions to perform, areas to identify),
- consequences in terms of score, feedback, and progression.
AI helps you expand this skeleton into a multitude of cases:
- “aggressive customer,” “passive customer,” “highly technical customer” versions;
- “minor incident,” “major incident,” “near-miss” versions;
- “senior employee,” “new hire” versions.
You’re not starting from scratch; you are creating families of scenarios that truly cover the diversity of field situations, without multiplying weeks of scriptwriting. The unit cost of the serious game drops significantly, and you can envision making it a standard format across entire roles, not just a showcase project.
To see concrete examples of serious games deployed at scale, you can discover our Client Cases, such as the cybersecurity project with Thales or the awareness program on safe handling with Manpower.
Integrating AI into a training / LMS / business ecosystem
As a training or HR manager, you don’t need an isolated gadget but a coherent ecosystem. A restructured system must coordinate:
- your LMS or LXP, where you manage learning paths, registrations, and records;
- your interactive scenarios (serious games, simulations) created with VTS Editor;
- your business tools (CRM, ticketing tools, ERP, etc.);
- your AI components (recommendation, analytics, conversational assistants).
Concretely, a VTS Editor scenario exported in SCORM integrates into the LMS. Tracking data (overall score, progression, badges, but also more detailed indicators in VTS Perform) can then be:
- analyzed to identify remediation needs;
- cross-referenced with business data (error rates, sales performance, incidents);
- used by AI models to detect weak signals: at-risk teams, underestimated skills, ineffective content.
With the Web Request block, it becomes possible to go even further by connecting the scenario itself to an external information system: adapting a case based on the learner’s real business sector, retrieving a product type, a customer segment, etc. AI no longer lives “on top of” your systems; it interacts with them.
Work on “learning analytics” confirms that these approaches make it possible to move from a very global view of training to a fine-grained management of the real effectiveness of systems (Ferguson, Journal of Learning Analytics, 2012).
Structured gamification: from “fun” to lasting engagement
Many HR directors are wary of gamification, often associated with a superficial playful veneer. Yet, when game mechanics are structured and aligned with competencies, they become a powerful lever for engagement and persistence.
VTS Editor already offers you a rich palette: Score, Badge, Counter, Countdown, Progress, Return / Checkpoint / Teleport to manage replays and levels, etc.
AI allows you to go beyond “points and badges for everyone”:
- adjust the difficulty of a case based on previous successes;
- modulate the nature of feedback (more factual, more coaching-oriented, more challenging) based on the learner’s profile;
- offer personalized challenges (“You’ve completed the standard level, would you like to try the ‘expert’ version?”).
You move beyond the “game for game’s sake” logic to create a motivating experience, perceived as useful by employees because it clearly helps them improve in their real situations. To delve deeper into how to design these gamified experiences, you can download the white paper Immersive Learning – The Missing Link in Training.
Putting AI at the service of a global pedagogical overhaul
Starting from business objectives and work situations
For a training or HR manager, the real question is not “how do I integrate AI?”, but “which business problems will AI help me address?”
The winning approach is to choose a first high-value use case:
- too many errors on a critical process;
- recurring safety incidents;
- customer dissatisfaction on a specific point;
- onboarding time considered too long.
From there, you can:
- Map out the key work situations in which behaviors must change.
- Turn them into playable scenarios in VTS Editor: scenes, decisions, typical errors, consequences.
- Use AI to multiply the cases, produce dialogues, generate feedback, while retaining business and compliance validation.
You obtain proof by example: an immersive, targeted system that makes sense both for the business units and for the learners. This type of approach illustrates how AI and the transformation of training are inseparable from clear business objectives.
You can also draw inspiration from detailed customer feedback in the Serious Factory white papers, which describe concrete cases of training system transformation.
Industrializing design without sacrificing pedagogical quality
The objection “we don’t have time to build scenarios for everything” is legitimate. Industrialization is therefore a key issue.
AI, combined with a no-code authoring tool, makes it possible to:
- standardize certain patterns: for example, a “difficult conversation,” “customer call,” or “incident analysis” scenario template;
- use the Function Call block to reuse entire sequences (briefing a character, displaying a dashboard, managing a debrief) across several scenarios;
- use variables and variable media to customize the same scenario based on job, product, or country, without duplicating everything;
- rely on AI to generate variations (dialogues, cases, feedback), then review them for validation.
Pedagogical quality does not come from the amount of text written by hand, but from the relevance of situations, the rhythm, and the clarity of feedback. These are the elements your designers must continue to work on in depth, while AI handles repetitive tasks.
Supporting change among training and HR teams
Restructuring training around AI and simulations is not just a matter of buying a tool. You need to bring teams on board.
This involves:
- awareness workshops to show, concretely, what an interactive scenario offers compared to a linear module;
- VTS Editor training for instructional designers, using cases directly drawn from your business context;
- sessions on best practices for generative AI (prompts, verification, bias) to avoid both excessive mistrust and naive enthusiasm;
- defining a governance framework: which uses are allowed, what validations are required, how learner data is handled.
By giving teams the means to master these new tools, you turn them into agents of transformation rather than executors worried about automation.
Measuring impact: from satisfaction to performance indicators
Finally, to convince your executive management in a lasting way, you will have to move from “our employees liked the training” to “here is what changed in the field.”
With VTS Editor and VTS Perform, you can gather rich indicators:
- success rates by competency,
- most frequent types of errors,
- progress over time,
- comparisons between populations (by role, region, seniority).
AI can then help correlate this data with business indicators: reduction in incidents, increase in NPS, reduction in processing time, etc. You are no longer dealing with opinions but with evidence.
This is when training stops being perceived as a cost center and starts being seen as a performance lever, precisely because you have chosen to deeply restructure it using AI and simulations.
AI as a lever for transformation, not just a cosmetic layer
For a training manager, instructional designer, or HR director, the real promise of AI is not to produce a quiz faster, but to enable:
- a shift from content transmission to immersive experiential learning;
- a move away from the module catalog model to managing a skills system;
- the transformation of trainers into experience designers;
- finally connecting training and business indicators.
Tools like VTS Editor provide the structure for designing these experiences: graphs, interaction blocks, gamification, SCORM export, integration with VTS Perform. AI adds speed, variety, and personalization.
If you had to remember just one idea, it would be this: don’t ask AI to marginally improve your current modules. Ask it to help you rethink how your employees learn their jobs, by confronting them with realistic situations, adapted to their level, connected to your challenges, and driven by data.
Only under these conditions will AI cease to be a gadget and become a strategic lever for transforming training in your company.
